"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of congress; but I repeat myself."
- Mark Twain
More pages: 1 2 3
New hair simulation demo
Monday, April 3, 2006 | Permalink

A new demo is up with some hair simulation. A balloon head is bouncing around throwing the hair around as if it was a shampoo commercial.

Name

Comment

Enter the code below



Humus
Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Well, if you want more than 4 components and you still need to support R420 and below you can always just use an interleave pass to put the data into every other pixel. This is done for instance in the Cloth sample in the ATI SDK.

Overlord
Tuesday, April 11, 2006

rP: that's not possible since R2VB is a rouge extention that ATI did when all others said it's not usefull alone, currently for nvidia you have to use PBOs.
The reason why Nvidia didn't chose to support R2VB is because it's use is a bit limited, for it to be more usefull you need to be able to read from buffers directly, I do think a more complete method of doing this supported by all parties will come pretty soon.
But R2VB shouldn't be used because it's not 100% shure it will be a permanent addition to both dx and openGL and it's not platform independent.

Humus
Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Both R2VB and VTF is included in DX10.

Elvis Enmanuel
Saturday, April 15, 2006

Nice work again Humus!

but, have you ever considered to implement a polygon-based implementation for realtime hair?

You can view my implementation in this videolink:

http://www.gamedusa.com/dev/downloads/dolphincs_suite.avi

ains.

Best regards:

Elvis Enmanuel

Rob L.
Wednesday, April 19, 2006

hi!

this demo will totally crash (xp bluescreen) my laptops Radeon X200m.

i have the 6.3 drivers installed...

any idea (don't tell me to get a better computer )

keep up the good work!

ps: schampoo is also written that way in german ;p

rP
Saturday, April 22, 2006

Overlord, thanks for the clarification.

Nuninho1980
Monday, November 20, 2006

geforce 8 series support this demo?

Humus
Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Nope.

More pages: 1 2 3